Digital Lexicon Hub

A system design in which human judgment, review, feedback, or authorization is deliberately incorporated into an automated or AI-enabled process.

HITL can reduce risk in ambiguous, high-impact, or low-confidence situations while preserving automation for routine work. It supports accountability and creates operational feedback for improvement.

An AI system drafts contract-risk findings but routes high-severity clauses and low-confidence results to qualified legal reviewers before any recommendation reaches a client.

Adding a person does not automatically create effective oversight. Reviewers may be overloaded, defer excessively to automation, lack context, or become a ceremonial approval step. Human review also adds cost and latency.

Humans may label data, validate outputs, resolve exceptions, approve high-impact actions, provide feedback, or take control when thresholds are exceeded. Effective HITL design specifies who intervenes, what information they receive, response times, authority, escalation, and how their decisions are recorded.